Sensitivity to deliberate sea salt seeding of marine clouds ? observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.125194, pp.2795-280710, 2012. ,
Sea-salt injections into the low-latitude marine boundary layer: The transient response in three Earth system models, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.25, issue.21, pp.12195-1220610, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1098/rsta.2008.0136
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01099544
Albedo enhancement of marine clouds to counteract global warming: impacts on the hydrological cycle, Climate Dynamics, vol.8, issue.7, pp.915-93110, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00382-010-0868-1
Geoengineering as an optimization problem, Environmental Research Letters, vol.5, issue.3, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034009
The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M ??? Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geoscientific Model Development, vol.6, issue.3, pp.687-72010, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013
Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis . Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p.1031, 2013. ,
Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?, Climatic Change, vol.433, issue.D4, pp.211-22010, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y
A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.2, issue.3-4, pp.3900-392310, 1002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/wcc.147
Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5, and Vuichard, N.: Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5, pp.2123-216510, 1007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00794170
An introduction to the bootstrap, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
Statistical methods for research workers, 1925. ,
Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, pp.572-597, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jame.20038
-induced climate change, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.8, issue.14, pp.2141-2144, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1029/1999GL006086
Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.5, issue.2, pp.1-610, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1029/2010GL044447
Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.63, issue.D10, pp.10-1029, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1029/2008JD011450
Geoengineering by stratospheric SO 2 injection: results from the Met Office HadGEM2 climate model and comparison with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.105194, pp.5999-600610, 2010. ,
The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.314, issue.2, pp.9743-9752, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01105166
Estimating Extremes in Transient Climate Change Simulations, Journal of Climate, vol.18, issue.8, pp.1156-1173, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1175/JCLI3320.1
Changes in Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in the IPCC Ensemble of Global Coupled Model Simulations, Journal of Climate, vol.20, issue.8, pp.1419-144410, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1175/JCLI4066.1
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Atmospheric Science Letters, vol.314, issue.2, pp.162-167, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asl.316
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01091232
An overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.314, issue.5798, pp.13103-1310710, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1131728
Control of global warming?, Nature, vol.347, issue.6291, pp.339-340, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1038/347339b0
Amelioration of global warming by controlled enhancement of the albedo and longevity of low-level maritime clouds, Atmospheric Science Letters, vol.12, issue.2-4, pp.52-58, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1006/asle.2002.0048
The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.95194, issue.10, pp.5539-5561, 2009. ,
Simulation and Projection of the Western Pacific Subtropical High in CMIP5 Models, J. Meteorol. Res, vol.28, pp.327-340, 2014. ,
Tropical rainforest response to marine sky brightening climate engineering, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.485, issue.7399, pp.2951-296010, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1029/2006GB002868
What is the limit of stratospheric sulfur climate engineering?, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol.15, issue.7, pp.10939-10969, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.5194/acpd-15-10939-2015
The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy, Atmospheric Science Letters, vol.109, issue.5880, pp.189-194, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asl.304
Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.34, issue.6136, pp.905-1110, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2
Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO 2 injections, J. Geophys. Res, pp.10-1029, 2008. ,
Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.314, issue.8, pp.19-70310, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1029/2009GL039209
Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO<sub>2</sub>: climate responses simulated by four earth system models, Earth System Dynamics, vol.3, issue.1, pp.63-78, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.5194/esd-3-63-2012
Climate extremes in climate engineering simulations ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01256669
Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.29, issue.22, pp.1716-1733, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jgrd.50203
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.93, issue.4, pp.485-498, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1