Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol.69, issue.1, pp.141-149, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11912-013-0303-y
Phase II cancer clinical trials with a one-sample log-rank test and its corrections based on the Edgeworth expansion, Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol.32, issue.1, pp.108-113, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cct.2010.09.009
Design of Phase II cancer trials evaluating survival probabilities, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol.7, issue.1, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1009621009283
Optimal Two-Stage Phase II Designs with Long-Term Endpoints, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, vol.2, issue.1, pp.51-61, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1198/sbr.2010.09001
Sample size calculation for the one-sample log-rank test, Pharmaceutical Statistics, vol.32, issue.1, pp.26-33, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cct.2010.09.009
Phase II clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints: optimal two-stage designs with one-sample log-rank test, Statistics in Medicine, vol.5, issue.12, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1740774508091748
URL : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4013236/pdf
One-stage and two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials with survival endpoints, Statistics in Medicine, vol.33, issue.22, pp.3830-3843, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1002/sim.6196
Group Sequential Designs for Monitoring Survival Probabilities, Biometrics, vol.52, issue.3, pp.1033-1041, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2533064
Comparing Survival of a Sample to That of a Standard Population, CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment, vol.95, issue.19, pp.1434-1439, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djg052
Rank Tests and a One-Sample Logrank Test for Comparing Observed Survival Data to a Standard Population, Biometrics, vol.37, issue.4, pp.687-696, 1981. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2530150
Counting Processes and Survival Analysis, 2011. ,
Randomized Phase II Cancer Clinical Trials, 2013. ,
Repeated Significance Testing for a General Class of Statistics Used in Censored Survival Analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.1, issue.380, pp.855-861, 1982. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/68.1.311
PIK3CA Pathway Mutations Predictive of Poor Response Following Standard Radiochemotherapy ?? Cetuximab in Cervical Cancer Patients, PIK3CA pathway mutations predictive of poor response following standard radiochemotherapy ± cetuximab in cervical cancer patients, pp.2530-2537, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2368
Randomized Designs for Early Trials of New Cancer Treatments???an Overview, Drug Information Journal, vol.31, issue.2, pp.387-396, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2529712
Randomized Phase II Designs, Clinical Cancer Research, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1883-1890, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2031
URL : http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/clincanres/15/6/1883.full.pdf
A two-stage design for phase II trials with time-to-event endpoint using restricted follow-up, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, vol.8, pp.127-134, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.010
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01617425