Recommendations for the Use of Automated Gray Matter Segmentation Tools: Evidence from Huntington’s Disease

Abstract : The selection of an appropriate segmentation tool is a challenge facing any researcher aiming to measure gray matter (GM) volume. Many tools have been compared, yet there is currently no method that can be recommended above all others; in particular, there is a lack of validation in disease cohorts. This work utilizes a clinical dataset to conduct an extensive comparison of segmentation tools. Our results confirm that all tools have advantages and disadvantages, and we present a series of considerations that may be of use when selecting a GM segmentation method, rather than a ranking of these tools. Seven segmentation tools were compared using 3 T MRI data from 20 controls, 40 pre-manifest Huntington's disease (HD), and 40 early HD participants. Segmented volumes underwent detailed visual quality control. Reliability and repeatability of total, cortical, and lobular GM were investigated in repeated baseline scans. The relationship between each tool was also examined. Longitudinal within-group change over 3 years was assessed via generalized least squares regression to determine sensitivity of each tool to disease effects. Visual quality control and raw volumes highlighted large variability between tools, especially in occipital and temporal regions. Most tools showed reliable performance and the volumes were generally correlated. Results for longitudinal within-group change varied between tools, especially within lobular regions. These differences highlight the need for careful selection of segmentation methods in clinical neuroimaging studies. This guide acts as a primer aimed at the novice or non-technical imaging scientist providing recommendations for the selection of cohort-appropriate GM segmentation software.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Frontiers in Neurology, Frontiers, 2017, 8, pp.519. 〈10.3389/fneur.2017.00519〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [41 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01622576
Contributeur : Gestionnaire Hal-Upmc <>
Soumis le : mardi 24 octobre 2017 - 14:52:30
Dernière modification le : vendredi 31 août 2018 - 08:47:30

Fichier

fneur-08-00519.pdf
Publication financée par une institution

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Eileanoir Johnson, Sarah Gregory, Hans Johnson, Alexandra Durr, Blair Leavitt, et al.. Recommendations for the Use of Automated Gray Matter Segmentation Tools: Evidence from Huntington’s Disease. Frontiers in Neurology, Frontiers, 2017, 8, pp.519. 〈10.3389/fneur.2017.00519〉. 〈hal-01622576〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

65

Téléchargements de fichiers

83