D. Baumhefner and P. Downey, Forecast intercomparisons from three numerical weather prediction models, Monthly Weather Review, vol.106, issue.9, pp.1245-1279, 1978.

S. Bony, B. Stevens, I. Held, J. Mitchell, J. Dufresne et al., Climate science for serving society, research, modeling and prediction priorities, pp.391-414, 2013.

U. Cubasch, Climate change 2001: The scientific basis, 2001.

P. Duhem, The aim and structure of physical theory, 1954.

P. N. Edwards, A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming, 2010.

V. Eyring, S. Bony, G. A. Meehl, C. A. Senior, B. Stevens et al., Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geoscientific Model Development, vol.9, issue.5, pp.1937-1958, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01339069

M. Frisch, Computer simulation validation: Fundamental concepts, methodological frameworks, and philosophical perspectives, pp.981-1004, 2019.

X. Gabaix and D. Laibson, The seven properties of good models, The foundations of positive and normative economics, 2008.

M. Gaetani and E. Mohino, Decadal prediction of the Sahelian precipitation in CMIP5 simulations, Journal of Climate, vol.26, issue.19, pp.7708-7719, 2013.

W. L. Gates, An AMS continuing series: Global change-AMIP: The atmospheric model intercomparison project, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.73, issue.12, pp.1962-1970, 1992.

W. L. Gates, Comments of the history of the working group on numerical experimentation, 2015.

W. L. Gates, J. S. Boyle, C. Covey, C. G. Dease, C. M. Doutriaux et al.,

D. N. Williams, An overview of the results of the atmospheric model intercomparison project (AMIP I), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.80, issue.1, pp.29-56, 1999.

F. Giorgi, Climate change 2001: The scientific basis, 2001.

V. Guemas, J. García-serrano, A. Mariotti, F. Doblas-reyes, and L. Caron, Prospects for decadal climate prediction in the Mediterranean region, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.141, issue.687, pp.580-597, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01140010

J. Hardwig, Epistemic dependence, Journal of Philosophy, vol.82, issue.7, pp.335-349, 1985.

D. D. Houghton and W. S. Irvine, A case study comparison of the performance of operational prediction models used in the United States, Monthly Weather Review, vol.104, issue.7, pp.817-827, 1976.

J. Houghton and B. Callander, Climate change 1992: the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment, 1992.

J. Houghton and G. Jenkins, IPCC first assessment report, 1990.

F. Hourdin, J. Grandpeix, C. Rio, S. Bony, A. Jam et al.,

R. Roehrig, LMDZ5B: the atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection, Climate Dynamics, vol.40, issue.9, pp.2193-2222, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01098866

F. Hourdin, T. Mauritsen, A. Gettelman, J. Golaz, V. Balaji et al.,

D. Williamson, The art and science of climate model tuning, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.98, issue.3, pp.589-602, 2017.

Y. Hu, L. Tao, and J. Liu, Poleward expansion of the Hadley circulation in CMIP5 simulations, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, vol.30, issue.3, pp.790-795, 2013.

J. Hurrell, G. A. Meehl, D. Bader, T. L. Delworth, B. Kirtman et al., , 2009.

, A unified modeling approach to climate system prediction, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.90, issue.12, pp.1819-1832

C. B. Jayasankar, S. Surendran, and K. Rajendran, Robust signals of future projections of indian summer monsoon rainfall by IPCC AR5 climate models: Role of seasonal cycle and interannual variability, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.42, issue.9, pp.3513-3520, 2015.

S. E. Jørgensen, Overview of the model types available for development of ecological models, Ecological Modelling, vol.215, issue.1, pp.3-9, 2008.

J. Katzav and W. S. Parker, The future of climate modeling, Climatic Change, vol.132, issue.4, pp.475-487, 2015.

C. Kent, R. Chadwick, and D. P. Rowell, Understanding uncertainties in future projections of seasonal tropical precipitation, Journal of Climate, vol.28, issue.11, pp.4390-4413, 2015.

R. Knutti, The end of model democracy?, Climatic Change, vol.102, issue.3, pp.395-404, 2010.

R. Knutti, R. Furrer, C. Tebaldi, J. Cermak, and G. A. Meehl, Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models, Journal of Climate, vol.23, issue.10, pp.2739-2758, 2010.

R. Knutti, D. Masson, and A. Gettelman, Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.40, issue.6, pp.1194-1199, 2013.

R. Knutti, J. Sedlá?ek, B. M. Sanderson, R. Lorenz, E. M. Fischer et al., A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.44, issue.4, pp.1909-1918, 2017.

J. Lenhard and E. Winsberg, Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol.41, pp.253-262, 2010.

D. J. Long and M. Collins, Quantifying global climate feedbacks, responses and forcing under abrupt and gradual CO2 forcing, Climate Dynamics, vol.41, issue.9, pp.2471-2479, 2013.

A. Luomaranta, K. Ruosteenoja, K. Jylhä, H. Gregow, J. Haapala et al., Multimodel estimates of the changes in the baltic sea ice cover during the present century, Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol.66, p.22617, 2014.

F. M. Luther, R. G. Ellingson, Y. Fouquart, S. Fels, N. A. Scott et al., Intercomparison of radiation codes in climate models (ICRCCM): Longwave clear-sky results-a workshop summary, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.69, issue.1, pp.40-48, 1988.

P. Maher, E. P. Gerber, B. Medeiros, T. M. Merlis, S. Sherwood et al.,

P. Zurita-gotor, Model hierarchies for understanding atmospheric circulation, Reviews of Geophysics, vol.57, issue.2, pp.250-280, 2019.

S. Manabe and K. Bryan, Climate calculations with a combined ocean-atmosphere model, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol.26, pp.786-789, 1969.

S. Manabe and R. T. Wetherald, The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol.32, issue.1, pp.3-15, 1975.

D. Masson and R. Knutti, Climate model genealogy, Geophysical Research Letters, issue.8, p.38, 2011.

&. Mcavaney, Climate change 2001: The scientific basis, 2001.

G. Meehl, C. Covey, B. Mcavaney, M. Latif, and S. Ronald, Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, issue.86, pp.89-93, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01339069

G. A. Meehl, Global coupled general circulation models, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1995.

G. A. Meehl, G. J. Boer, C. Covey, M. Latif, and R. J. Stouffer, Intercomparison makes for a better climate model, Transactions American Geophysical Union, vol.78, issue.41, pp.445-451, 1997.

G. A. Meehl, C. Covey, T. Delworth, M. Latif, B. Mcavaney et al.,

K. E. Taylor, The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climate change research, vol.88, pp.1383-1394, 2007.

G. A. Meehl, L. Goddard, G. Boer, R. Burgman, G. Branstator et al., Decadal climate prediction: An update from the trenches, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.95, issue.2, pp.243-267, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01496421

N. Nakicenovic and R. Swart, Emissions scenarios -special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2000.

, Survey of the climate simulation capability of global circulation models, National Academy of Sciences, pp.196-239, 1975.

D. Notz, F. A. Haumann, H. Haak, J. H. Jungclaus, and J. Marotzke, Arctic sea-ice evolution as modeled by Max Planck Institute for Meteorology's earth system model, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, vol.5, issue.6, pp.173-194, 2013.

L. Oreopoulos, E. Mlawer, J. Delamere, T. Shippert, J. Cole et al., The continual intercomparison of radiation codes: Results from phase I, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, issue.D6, p.117, 2012.

T. Palmer and B. Stevens, The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.116, pp.24390-24395, 2019.

T. N. Palmer, Towards the probabilistic Earth-system simulator: a vision for the future of climate and weather prediction, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.138, issue.665, pp.841-861, 2012.

W. S. Parker, When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions, Philosophy of Science, vol.78, issue.4, pp.579-600, 2011.

O. Penalba and J. Rivera, Future changes in drought characteristics over Southern South America projected by a CMIP5 multi-model ensemble, American Journal of Climate Change, vol.2, pp.173-182, 2013.

R. Pincus, E. J. Mlawer, and J. S. Delamere, Balancing accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility in radiation calculations for dynamical models, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, vol.11, issue.10, pp.3074-3089, 2019.

R. Pincus, E. J. Mlawer, L. Oreopoulos, A. S. Ackerman, S. Baek et al.,

D. M. Schwarzkopf, Radiative flux and forcing parameterization error in aerosol-free clear skies, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.42, issue.13, pp.5485-5492, 2015.

R. Pincus and B. Stevens, Paths to accuracy for radiation parameterizations in atmospheric models, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, vol.5, issue.2, pp.225-233, 2013.

Z. Pirtle, R. Meyer, and A. Hemilton, What does it mean when climate models agree? A case for assessing independence among general circulation models, Environmental Science and Policy, 2010.

J. Pitt, Thinking about technology: Foundations of the philosophy of technology, 2000.

G. L. Potter and W. L. Gates, A preliminary intercomparison of the seasonal response of two atmospheric climate models, Monthly Weather Review, vol.112, issue.5, pp.909-917, 1984.

X. Qu and A. Hall, On the persistent spread in snow-albedo feedback, Climate Dynamics, vol.42, issue.1, pp.69-81, 2014.

C. Rochetin, F. Hourdin, F. Couvreux, and A. Jam, Resolved versus parametrized boundary-layer plumes. part II: Continuous formulations of mixing rates for mass-flux schemes, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol.135, issue.3, pp.469-483, 2010.

N. Rochetin, F. Couvreux, J. Grandpeix, and C. Rio, Deep convection triggering by boundary layer thermals. part I: Les analysis and stochastic triggering formulation, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol.71, issue.2, pp.496-514, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01083241

S. Shackley, P. Young, S. Parkinson, and B. Wynne, Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: Are GCMs the best tools? Climatic Change, vol.38, pp.159-205, 1998.

J. Shukla, R. Hagedorn, M. Miller, T. N. Palmer, B. Hoskins et al., Strategies: Revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: A declaration at the world modelling summit for climate prediction, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.90, issue.2, pp.175-178, 2009.

A. K. Srivastava and T. Delsole, Robust forced response in South Asian summer monsoon in a future climate, Journal of Climate, vol.27, issue.20, pp.7849-7860, 2014.

D. A. Stainforth, T. E. Downing, R. Washington, A. Lopez, and M. New, Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol.365, pp.2163-2177, 1857.

S. L. Stevenson, Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: Results from CMIP5, Geophysical Research Letters, issue.17, p.39, 2012.

A. S. Taschetto, A. S. Gupta, N. C. Jourdain, A. Santoso, C. C. Ummenhofer et al., Cold tongue and warm pool ENSO events in CMIP5: Mean state and future projections, Journal of Climate, vol.27, issue.8, pp.2861-2885, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02433656

K. E. Taylor, R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl, An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.93, issue.4, pp.485-498, 2012.

C. Tebaldi and R. Knutti, The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol.365, pp.2053-2075, 1857.

W. M. Washington, A. J. Semtner, G. A. Meehl, D. J. Knight, and T. A. Mayer, , 1980.

, A general circulation experiment with a coupled atmosphere, ocean and sea ice model, Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol.10, issue.12, pp.1887-1908

W. , Report of the tenth session of the JSC/CLIVAR working group on coupled modelling, WCRP Informal Report, issue.5, 2006.

W. , Report of the sixteenth session of the working group on coupled modelling, WCRP Report, issue.2, 2012.

W. , Report of the eighteenth session of the working group on coupled modelling, WCRP Report, issue.2, 2014.

E. Winsberg, Philosophy and climate science, 2018.

R. J. Zomer, A. Trabucco, M. J. Metzger, M. Wang, K. P. Oli et al., Projected climate change impacts on spatial distribution of bioclimatic zones and ecoregions within the Kailash sacred landscape of China, Climatic Change, vol.125, issue.3, pp.445-460, 2014.

L. Zou and T. Zhou, Asian summer monsoon onset in simulations and CMIP5 projections using four Chinese climate models, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, p.32, 2015.