J. Airbib and T. Seba, Rethinking transportation 2020-2030: The disruption of transportation and the collapse of the internal-combustion vehicle and oil industries. RethinkX: Rethink Transportation, 2017.

R. Arkin, Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots, 2009.

E. Awad, S. Dsouza, R. Kim, J. Schulz, J. Henrich et al., The moral machine experiment, Nature, vol.563, issue.7729, p.59, 2018.

G. Bahouth, J. Graygo, K. Digges, C. Schulman, and P. Baur, The benefits and tradeoffs for varied high-severity injury risk thresholds for advanced automatic crash notification systems, Traffic Injury Prevention, vol.15, issue.1, pp.134-140, 2014.

V. Bhargava and T. W. Kim, Autonomous vehicles and moral uncertainty autonomous vehicles and moral uncertainty, pp.5-19, 2017.

J. F. Bonnefon, A. Shariff, and I. Rahwan, The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles, Science, vol.352, issue.6293, pp.1573-1576, 2016.

V. Bonnemains, C. Saurel, and C. Tessier, Embedded ethics: Some technical and ethical challenges, Ethics and Information Technology, vol.20, issue.1, pp.41-58, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01697137

J. J. Bryson, Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics, Ethics and Information Technology, vol.20, pp.15-26, 2018.

B. Casey, Amoral machines, or: How roboticists can learn to stop worrying and love the law, Northwestern University Law Review, vol.111, p.1347, 2016.

G. Contissa, F. Lagioia, and G. Sartor, The ethical knob: Ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law, Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol.25, issue.3, pp.365-378, 2017.

D. Copp, The oxford handbook of ethical theory, 2005.

G. Crocetta, S. Piantini, M. Pierini, and C. Simms, The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.79, pp.56-69, 2015.

J. Danaher, The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation, Philosophy and Technology, vol.29, issue.3, pp.245-268, 2016.

J. Dancy, Ethics without principles, 2004.

N. De-moura, R. Chatila, K. Evans, S. Chauvier, and E. Dogan, Ethical decision making for autonomous vehicles, 2020 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (iv), 2020.

F. S. De-sio, Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol.20, issue.2, pp.411-429, 2017.

E. Dietrich, Homo sapiens 2.0: Why we should build the better robots of our nature, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol.13, issue.4, pp.323-328, 2001.

V. Dignum, Responsible artificial intelligence: How to develop and use AI in a responsible way, 2019.

S. Epting, Automated vehicles and transportation justice, Philosophy and Technology, vol.32, pp.389-403, 2018.

L. Evans, Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using newtonian mechanics, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.26, issue.5, pp.609-616, 1994.

D. J. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol.77, pp.167-181, 2015.

P. Foot, Theories of ethics, 1967.

B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn, and A. Borning, Value sensitive design and information systems, The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp.69-101, 2008.

P. Gao, H. W. Kaas, D. Mohr, and D. Wee, Automotive revolution-perspective towards 2030: How the convergence of disruptive technology-driven trends could transform the auto industry, Advanced Industries, McKinsey & Company, 2016.

J. C. Gerdes and S. M. Thornton, Implementable ethics for autonomous vehicles, Autonomes fahren, pp.87-102, 2015.

J. Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perceptions, 1979.

J. J. Gibson and L. E. Crooks, A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.51, issue.3, pp.453-471, 1938.

J. Gips, Toward the ethical robot, 1994.

N. J. Goodall, Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes, Transportation Research Record, vol.2424, issue.1, pp.58-65, 2014.

C. Grau, There is no" i" in" robot": Robots and utilitarianism, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.21, issue.4, pp.52-55, 2006.

J. Greene, F. Rossi, J. Tasioulas, K. B. Venable, and B. Williams, Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations, Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial, intelligence. Himmelreich, vol.21, pp.669-684, 2016.

I. G. Initiative, Ethically aligned design, IEEE Standards v1, 2016.

A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol.1, issue.9, pp.389-399, 2019.

D. Johnson and T. M. Powers, Computers as surrogate agents. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp.251-269, 2008.

C. Jurewicz, A. Sobhani, J. Woolley, J. Dutschke, and B. Corben, Exploration of vehicle impact speed-injury severity relationships for application in safer road design, Transportation Research Procedia, vol.14, pp.4247-4256, 2016.

S. Kagan, The limits of well-being, Social Philosophy and Policy, vol.9, issue.2, pp.169-189, 1992.

M. Kearns and A. Roth, The ethical algorithm: The science of socially aware algorithm design, 2019.

G. Keeling, Legal necessity, pareto efficiency and justified killing in autonomous vehicle collisions, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol.21, pp.413-427, 2018.

G. Keeling, Why trolley problems matter for the ethics of automated vehicles, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.26, pp.293-307, 2019.

G. Keeling, K. Evans, S. M. Thornton, G. Mecacci, and F. S. De-sio, Four perspectives on what matters for the ethics of automated vehicles, 2019.

H. R. Kröyer, Is 30 km/ha 'safe'speed? injury severity of pedestrians struck by a vehicle and the relation to travel speed and age, IATSS Research, vol.39, issue.1, pp.42-50, 2015.

D. Leben, A rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles, Ethics and Information Technology, vol.19, issue.2, pp.107-115, 2017.

D. Leben, Ethics for robots: How to design a moral algorithm, 2018.

R. Leenes and F. Lucivero, Laws on robots, laws by robots, laws in robots: Regulating robot behaviour by design, Law, Innovation and Technology, vol.6, issue.2, pp.193-220, 2014.

P. Lin, K. Abney, and R. Jenkins, Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence, 2017.

J. Liu, A. Hainen, X. Li, Q. Nie, and S. Nambisan, Pedestrian injury severity in motor vehicle crashes: an integrated spatio-temporal modeling approach, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.132, p.105272, 2019.

C. Luetge, The german ethics code for automated and connected driving, Philosophy and Technology, vol.30, issue.4, pp.547-558, 2017.

E. J. Mackenzie, S. Shapiro, and J. N. Eastham, The abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: Levels of inter-and intrarater reliability, Medical Care, pp.823-835, 1985.

A. Malczyk, G. Müller, and T. Gehlert, The increasing role of suvs in crash involvement in germany, 2012.

J. L. Martin and D. Wu, Pedestrian fatality and impact speed squared: Cloglog modeling from french national data, Traffic Injury Prevention, vol.19, issue.1, pp.94-101, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01557978

J. Millar, P. Lin, K. Abney, and G. Bekey, Ethics settings for autonomous vehicles. In Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence, 2017.

K. Mizuno and J. Kajzer, Compatibility problems in frontal, side, single car collisions and car-topedestrian accidents in Japan, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.31, issue.4, pp.381-391, 1999.

T. Nagel, Moral luck, Mortal questions, pp.24-38, 2012.

R. Noothigattu, S. S. Gaikwad, E. Awad, S. Dsouza, I. Rahwan et al., A voting-based system for ethical decision making, Thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial, intelligence. Nozick, R, 1981.

S. Nyholm and J. Smids, The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol.19, issue.5, pp.1275-1289, 2016.

E. G. Technologies and N. , Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and 'autonomous' systems, On Ethics in Science, 2018.

D. Parfit, Reasons and persons, 1984.

D. Parfit, On what matters, vol.2, 2011.

H. Prakken, On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law, Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol.25, issue.3, pp.341-363, 2017.

H. A. Prichard, Moral writings, vol.3, 2002.

X. Qian, I. Navarro, A. De-la-fortelle, and F. Moutarde, Motion planning for urban autonomous driving using Bézier curves and MPC, 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp.826-833, 2016.

A. Rizaldi, J. Keinholz, M. Huber, J. Feldle, F. Immler et al., Formalising and monitoring traffic rules for autonomous vehicles in Isabelle/HOL, International conference on integrated formal methods, pp.50-66, 2017.

E. Rosen, H. Stigson, and U. Sander, Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.43, issue.1, pp.25-33, 2011.

T. Scanlon, What we owe to each other, 1998.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02942737

O. Sigaud and O. Buffet, Markov decision processes in artificial intelligence, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00432735

C. K. Simms and D. P. Wood, Pedestrian risk from cars and sport utility vehicles-a comparative analytical study, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol.220, issue.8, pp.1085-1100, 2006.

B. Talbot, R. Jenkins, and D. Purves, When robots should do the wrong thing, Robot Ethics, vol.2, pp.258-273, 2017.

A. Voorhoeve, How should we aggregate competing claims?, Ethics, vol.125, issue.1, pp.64-87, 2014.

W. Weijermars, N. Bos, A. Schoeters, J. C. Meunier, N. Nuyttens et al., Serious road traffic injuries in europe, lessons from the eu research project safetycube, Transportation Research Record, issue.32, pp.1-9, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02265869

Y. Wilks, Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues, vol.8, 2010.

, Global status report on road safety 2018, 2018.

, Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations