Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study

Abstract : Background: Cluster (CRTs) and individually randomized trials (IRTs) are often pooled together in meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized trials. However, the potential systematic differences in intervention effect estimates between these two trial types has never been investigated. Therefore, we conducted a meta-epidemiological study comparing intervention effect estimates between CRTs and IRTs. Methods: All Cochrane MAs including at least one CRT and one IRT, published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, were included. For each MA, we estimated a ratio of odds ratios (ROR) for binary outcomes or a difference of standardized differences (DSMD) for continuous outcomes, where less than 1 (or 0, respectively) indicated a greater intervention effect estimate with CRTs. Results: Among 1301 screened reviews, we selected 121 MAs, of which 76 had a binary outcome and 45 had a continuous outcome. For binary outcomes, intervention effect estimates did not differ between CRTs and IRTs [ROR 1.00, 95% confidence interval (0.93 to 1.08)]. Subgroup and adjusted analyses led to consistent results. For continuous outcomes, the DSMD was 0.13 (0.06 to 0.19). It was lower for MAs with a pharmacological intervention [-0.03, (-0.12 to 0.07)], an objective outcome [0.05, (-0.08 to 0.17)] or after adjusting for trial size [0.06, (-0.01 to 0.15)]. Conclusion: For binary outcomes, CRTs and IRTs can safely be pooled in MAs because of an absence of systematic differences between effect estimates. For continuous outcomes, the results were less clear although accounting for trial sample sizes led to a non-significant difference. More research is needed for continuous outcomes and, meanwhile, MAs should be completed with subgroup analyses (CRTs vs IRTs).
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [30 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Gestionnaire Hal-Su <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, September 10, 2019 - 11:02:03 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, September 12, 2019 - 1:26:31 AM
Long-term archiving on: Friday, February 7, 2020 - 11:14:19 PM


Publication funded by an institution



Clémence Leyrat, Agnès Caille, Sandra Eldridge, Sally Kerry, Agnès Dechartres, et al.. Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. International Journal of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019, 48 (2), pp.609-619. ⟨10.1093/ije/dyy229⟩. ⟨hal-02282674⟩



Record views


Files downloads