Cancer Patients’ Prehospital Emergency Care: Post Hoc Analysis from the French Prospective Multicenter Study EPICANCER - Sorbonne Université Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Clinical Medicine Année : 2021

Cancer Patients’ Prehospital Emergency Care: Post Hoc Analysis from the French Prospective Multicenter Study EPICANCER

Olivier Peyrony
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1067394
Jean-Paul Fontaine
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094352
Lionel Nakad
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094353
Adrien Picaud
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094355
Juliane Bosc
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094356
Laurent Jacquin
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094357
Saïd Laribi
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094358
Laurent Pereira
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094359
Sylvain Thiriez
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094360
Alexandre Tanneau
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1094361

Résumé

Background: Very little data are available concerning the prehospital emergency care of cancer patients. The objective of this study is to report the trajectories and outcomes of cancer patients attended by prehospital emergency services. Methods: This was an ancillary study from a three-day cross-sectional prospective multicenter study in France. Adult patients with cancer were included if they called the emergency medical dispatch center Service d’Aide Médicale Urgente (SAMU). The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03393260, accessed on 8th January 2018). Results: During the study period, 1081 cancer patients called the SAMU. The three most frequent reasons were dyspnea (20.2%), neurological disorder (15.4%), and fatigue (13.1%). Among those patients, 949 (87.8%) were directed to the hospital, among which 802 (90.8%) were directed to an emergency department (ED) and 44 (5%) were transported directly to an intensive care unit (ICU). A mobile intensive care unit (MICU) was dispatched 213 (31.6%) times. The decision to dispatch an MICU seemed generally based on the patient’s reason for seeking emergency care and the presence of severity signs rather than on the malignancy or the patient general health status. Among the patients who were directed to the ED, 98 (16.1%) were deceased on day 30. Mortality was 15.4% for those patients directed to the ED but who were not admitted to the ICU in the next 7 days, 28.2% for those who were admitted to ICU in the next 7 days, and 56.1% for those patients transported by the MICU directly to the ICU. Conclusion: Cancer patients attending prehospital emergency care were most often directed to EDs. Patients who were directly transported to the ICU had a high mortality rate, raising the question of improving triage policies. View Full-Text
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
jcm-10-01145.pdf (949.39 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Publication financée par une institution

Dates et versions

hal-03178833 , version 1 (24-03-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Olivier Peyrony, Jean-Paul Fontaine, Eloïse Trabattoni, Lionel Nakad, Sylvain Charreyre, et al.. Cancer Patients’ Prehospital Emergency Care: Post Hoc Analysis from the French Prospective Multicenter Study EPICANCER. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021, 10 (5), pp.1145. ⟨10.3390/jcm10051145⟩. ⟨hal-03178833⟩
47 Consultations
68 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More