Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts - Sorbonne Université
Journal Articles Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Year : 2020

Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts

Abstract

We examine differences among reanalysis high-cloud products in the tropics, assess the impacts of these differences on radiation budgets at the top of the atmosphere and within the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), and discuss their possible origins in the context of the reanalysis models. We focus on the ERA5 (fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts-ECMWF-reanalysis), ERA-Interim (ECMWF Interim Reanalysis), JRA-55 (Japanese 55-year Reanaly-sis), MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2), and CFSR/CFSv2 (Cli-mate Forecast System Reanalysis/Climate Forecast System Version 2) reanalyses. As a general rule, JRA-55 produces the smallest tropical high-cloud fractions and cloud water contents among the reanalyses, while MERRA-2 produces the largest. Accordingly, long-wave cloud radiative effects are relatively weak in JRA-55 and relatively strong in MERRA-2. Only MERRA-2 and ERA5 among the reanaly-ses produce tropical-mean values of outgoing long-wave radiation (OLR) close to those observed, but ERA5 tends to underestimate cloud effects, while MERRA-2 tends to overestimate variability. ERA5 also produces distributions of long-wave, shortwave , and total cloud radiative effects at the top of the atmosphere that are very consistent with those observed. The other reanalyses all exhibit substantial biases in at least one of these metrics, although compensation between the long-wave and shortwave effects helps to constrain biases in the total cloud radiative effect for most reanalyses. The vertical distribution of cloud water content emerges as a key difference between ERA-Interim and other reanalyses. Whereas ERA-Interim shows a monotonic decrease of cloud water content with increasing height, the other reanalyses all produce distinct anvil layers. The latter is in better agreement with observations and yields very different profiles of radia-tive heating in the UTLS. For example, whereas the altitude of the level of zero net radiative heating tends to be lower in convective regions than in the rest of the tropics in ERA-Interim, the opposite is true for the other four reanalyses. Differences in cloud water content also help to explain systematic differences in radiative heating in the tropical lower stratosphere among the reanalyses. We discuss several ways in which aspects of the cloud and convection schemes impact the tropical environment. Discrepancies in the vertical profiles of temperature and specific humidity in convective regions are particularly noteworthy, as these variables are directly constrained by data assimilation, are widely used, and Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 8990 J. S. Wright et al.: Tropical high clouds in reanalyses feed back to convective behaviour through their relationships with thermodynamic stability.

Domains

Meteorology
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
acp-20-8989-2020.pdf (14.09 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publication funded by an institution
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02935646 , version 1 (17-09-2020)

Identifiers

Cite

Jonathon S Wright, Xiaoyi Sun, Paul Konopka, Kirstin Krüger, Bernard Legras, et al.. Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20 (14), pp.8989 - 9030. ⟨10.5194/acp-20-8989-2020⟩. ⟨hal-02935646⟩
294 View
94 Download

Altmetric

Share

More